Krillion Recorded answers
4,381 recorded answers
How to approach it
Treat the answer as a breadth test rather than a knowledge test: the scorer rewards distance from the middle of the distribution, so the goal is to generate volume first and refine second. Work through the academic map systematically, by faculty, then by department, then by the sub-specialisms inside each department, and keep a running list without judging entries. When a field dries up, mine the seams between disciplines, the professional and clinical training routes, and the titles that attach a place, a material or a technique to a discipline. Only after you have a long list should you cut the weakest entries. Save your single boldest, most niche pick for the moment you feel the list is running dry, because that is where the points live.
Get a hint
Begin with the widest possible sweep of post-secondary study: every faculty, school and department that confers a formal degree, and let the list run far past the handful of titles everyone knows.
A little more
Once the obvious fields are exhausted, push into the hybrid and vocational corners: programmes that fuse two disciplines into a single named degree, or that prepare students for one licensed trade.
One step further
Now go micro: titles tied to a single material, technique, instrument, region, species, patient group or single campus, often only a few words long and offered by just one institution.
Reveal answers 4,381
- Environmental science and engineeringDeep Cut85points
- Environmental science and managementDeep Cut85points
- Environmental science and public policyDeep Cut85points
- Environmental sciences, policy and managementDeep Cut85points
- Environmental social scienceDeep Cut85points
- Environmental sociologyDeep Cut85points
- Environmental sustainabilityDeep Cut85points
- Environmental systems engineeringDeep Cut85points
- Environmental systems scienceDeep Cut85points
- Environmental technology and managementDeep Cut85points
- Environmental toxicologyDeep Cut85points
- Epidemiology and biostatisticsDeep Cut85points
- Epistemology, ethics and mindDeep Cut85points
- Equestrian studiesDeep Cut85points
- Equine industry managementDeep Cut85points
- Equine medicineDeep Cut85points
- Equine scienceDeep Cut85points
- ErzyaDeep Cut85points
- Esports managementDeep Cut85points
- Estate managementDeep Cut85points
- Estate planningDeep Cut85points
- EstonianDeep Cut85points
- Ethical hackingDeep Cut85points
- Ethics and legal studiesDeep Cut85points
- Ethics and technologyDeep Cut85points
- Ethics, politics and economicsDeep Cut85points
- Ethics, society and lawDeep Cut85points
- Ethiopian studiesDeep Cut85points
- Ethnicity, race and migrationDeep Cut85points
- EthnobiologyDeep Cut85points
- EthnobotanyDeep Cut85points
- EthnographyDeep Cut85points
- EthnomusicologyDeep Cut85points
- EuphoniumDeep Cut85points
- Eurasian studiesDeep Cut85points
- EurhythmicsDeep Cut85points
- European affairsDeep Cut85points
- European and Middle Eastern languagesDeep Cut85points
- European and Russian studiesDeep Cut85points
- European business studiesDeep Cut85points
- European economicsDeep Cut85points
- European ethnologyDeep Cut85points
- European languagesDeep Cut85points
- European lawDeep Cut85points
- European politicsDeep Cut85points
- European studiesDeep Cut85points
- European Union studiesDeep Cut85points
- Evolution of language and cognitionDeep Cut85points
- Evolutionary anthropologyDeep Cut85points
- Evolutionary developmental biologyDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
The scoring here rewards specificity, and the reveal shows it plainly. Of the recorded answers, 4298 cleared sixty points, but only one reached the top: Bagpiping at 100, a title so narrow that few players would ever think of it. The 85-point band, 3803 answers deep, is where disciplined, specific thinking lands; entries such as Accelerator physics, Acoustics and music technology, Adult-gerontology nurse practitioner or Accounting information systems each fuse a subject with a qualifier, a population or a second field. The 60-point band, 494 answers, is thinner and holds titles closer to the centre of the distribution: real, respectable degrees whose names are broad enough that a large share of players reach them. Practical lesson: a plain discipline name is short and safe but cheap, a two-part hybrid name is the reliable workhorse, and the rare one-institution curiosity is the only route to a perfect score. Precision in naming, not obscurity of subject, separates the bands.