Krillion Recorded answers
4,381 recorded answers
How to approach it
Treat the answer as a breadth test rather than a knowledge test: the scorer rewards distance from the middle of the distribution, so the goal is to generate volume first and refine second. Work through the academic map systematically, by faculty, then by department, then by the sub-specialisms inside each department, and keep a running list without judging entries. When a field dries up, mine the seams between disciplines, the professional and clinical training routes, and the titles that attach a place, a material or a technique to a discipline. Only after you have a long list should you cut the weakest entries. Save your single boldest, most niche pick for the moment you feel the list is running dry, because that is where the points live.
Get a hint
Begin with the widest possible sweep of post-secondary study: every faculty, school and department that confers a formal degree, and let the list run far past the handful of titles everyone knows.
A little more
Once the obvious fields are exhausted, push into the hybrid and vocational corners: programmes that fuse two disciplines into a single named degree, or that prepare students for one licensed trade.
One step further
Now go micro: titles tied to a single material, technique, instrument, region, species, patient group or single campus, often only a few words long and offered by just one institution.
Reveal answers 4,381
- Archaeological conservationDeep Cut85points
- Archaeological scienceDeep Cut85points
- Archaeology and the ancient worldDeep Cut85points
- ArchaeometryDeep Cut85points
- Architectural designDeep Cut85points
- Architectural draftingDeep Cut85points
- Architectural engineering technologyDeep Cut85points
- Architectural historyDeep Cut85points
- Architectural ScienceDeep Cut85points
- Architectural studiesDeep Cut85points
- Architectural technologyDeep Cut85points
- Archival studiesDeep Cut85points
- Arctic studiesDeep Cut85points
- Area studiesDeep Cut85points
- ArmenianDeep Cut85points
- Art and archaeology of the Mediterranean worldDeep Cut85points
- Art and computationDeep Cut85points
- Art and technologyDeep Cut85points
- Art businessDeep Cut85points
- Art conservationDeep Cut85points
- Art criticismDeep Cut85points
- Art directionDeep Cut85points
- Art lawDeep Cut85points
- Art market studiesDeep Cut85points
- Art, education and community practiceDeep Cut85points
- Art, film and visual studiesDeep Cut85points
- Arthurian studiesDeep Cut85points
- Artificial intelligence and data scienceDeep Cut85points
- Artificial intelligence and decision makingDeep Cut85points
- Artificial intelligence and machine learningDeep Cut85points
- Artificial intelligence engineeringDeep Cut85points
- Artificial intelligence for businessDeep Cut85points
- Artificial intelligence for learningDeep Cut85points
- Artificial intelligence in information technologyDeep Cut85points
- Arts administration, education and policyDeep Cut85points
- Arts and entertainment technologiesDeep Cut85points
- Arts and humanitiesDeep Cut85points
- Arts entrepreneurshipDeep Cut85points
- Arts in medicineDeep Cut85points
- Arts integrationDeep Cut85points
- Arts managementDeep Cut85points
- Asia Pacific policy studiesDeep Cut85points
- Asian and Middle Eastern studiesDeep Cut85points
- Asian artDeep Cut85points
- Asian bodywork therapyDeep Cut85points
- Asian historyDeep Cut85points
- Asian languagesDeep Cut85points
- Asian languages and culturesDeep Cut85points
- Asian lawDeep Cut85points
- Asian literature, religion and cultureDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
The scoring here rewards specificity, and the reveal shows it plainly. Of the recorded answers, 4298 cleared sixty points, but only one reached the top: Bagpiping at 100, a title so narrow that few players would ever think of it. The 85-point band, 3803 answers deep, is where disciplined, specific thinking lands; entries such as Accelerator physics, Acoustics and music technology, Adult-gerontology nurse practitioner or Accounting information systems each fuse a subject with a qualifier, a population or a second field. The 60-point band, 494 answers, is thinner and holds titles closer to the centre of the distribution: real, respectable degrees whose names are broad enough that a large share of players reach them. Practical lesson: a plain discipline name is short and safe but cheap, a two-part hybrid name is the reliable workhorse, and the rare one-institution curiosity is the only route to a perfect score. Precision in naming, not obscurity of subject, separates the bands.