Krillion Recorded answers
4,381 recorded answers
How to approach it
Treat the answer as a breadth test rather than a knowledge test: the scorer rewards distance from the middle of the distribution, so the goal is to generate volume first and refine second. Work through the academic map systematically, by faculty, then by department, then by the sub-specialisms inside each department, and keep a running list without judging entries. When a field dries up, mine the seams between disciplines, the professional and clinical training routes, and the titles that attach a place, a material or a technique to a discipline. Only after you have a long list should you cut the weakest entries. Save your single boldest, most niche pick for the moment you feel the list is running dry, because that is where the points live.
Get a hint
Begin with the widest possible sweep of post-secondary study: every faculty, school and department that confers a formal degree, and let the list run far past the handful of titles everyone knows.
A little more
Once the obvious fields are exhausted, push into the hybrid and vocational corners: programmes that fuse two disciplines into a single named degree, or that prepare students for one licensed trade.
One step further
Now go micro: titles tied to a single material, technique, instrument, region, species, patient group or single campus, often only a few words long and offered by just one institution.
Reveal answers 4,381
- ASL educationDeep Cut85points
- ASL linguisticsDeep Cut85points
- AssameseDeep Cut85points
- Assistive technologyDeep Cut85points
- AssyriologyDeep Cut85points
- Astronautical engineeringDeep Cut85points
- Astronomical and planetary sciencesDeep Cut85points
- Athletic administrationDeep Cut85points
- Atmosphere and energyDeep Cut85points
- Atmospheric and oceanic sciencesDeep Cut85points
- Atmospheric physicsDeep Cut85points
- Atmospheric scienceDeep Cut85points
- Atomic and molecular physicsDeep Cut85points
- Audiology and speech-language pathologyDeep Cut85points
- Audiovisual communicationDeep Cut85points
- Audiovisual communications technologyDeep Cut85points
- AuditingDeep Cut85points
- Auditory and language neuroscienceDeep Cut85points
- AuslanDeep Cut85points
- Australian Indigenous languagesDeep Cut85points
- Australian studiesDeep Cut85points
- Autism educationDeep Cut85points
- Auto collision repairDeep Cut85points
- Auto restorationDeep Cut85points
- Automation engineeringDeep Cut85points
- Automation engineering technologyDeep Cut85points
- Automotive and mobility studiesDeep Cut85points
- Automotive engineering technologyDeep Cut85points
- Automotive marketingDeep Cut85points
- Automotive service managementDeep Cut85points
- Automotive systemsDeep Cut85points
- Autonomous vehicle systemsDeep Cut85points
- AvarDeep Cut85points
- Avian sciencesDeep Cut85points
- Aviation and aerospace sustainabilityDeep Cut85points
- Aviation business risk managementDeep Cut85points
- Aviation cybersecurityDeep Cut85points
- Aviation environmental scienceDeep Cut85points
- Aviation financeDeep Cut85points
- Aviation lawDeep Cut85points
- Aviation maintenance technologyDeep Cut85points
- Aviation managementDeep Cut85points
- Aviation safetyDeep Cut85points
- Aviation securityDeep Cut85points
- Aviation servicesDeep Cut85points
- Aviation technologyDeep Cut85points
- AvionicsDeep Cut85points
- Avionics engineeringDeep Cut85points
- AwadhiDeep Cut85points
- AymaraDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
The scoring here rewards specificity, and the reveal shows it plainly. Of the recorded answers, 4298 cleared sixty points, but only one reached the top: Bagpiping at 100, a title so narrow that few players would ever think of it. The 85-point band, 3803 answers deep, is where disciplined, specific thinking lands; entries such as Accelerator physics, Acoustics and music technology, Adult-gerontology nurse practitioner or Accounting information systems each fuse a subject with a qualifier, a population or a second field. The 60-point band, 494 answers, is thinner and holds titles closer to the centre of the distribution: real, respectable degrees whose names are broad enough that a large share of players reach them. Practical lesson: a plain discipline name is short and safe but cheap, a two-part hybrid name is the reliable workhorse, and the rare one-institution curiosity is the only route to a perfect score. Precision in naming, not obscurity of subject, separates the bands.