Krillion Recorded answers
4,381 recorded answers
How to approach it
Treat the answer as a breadth test rather than a knowledge test: the scorer rewards distance from the middle of the distribution, so the goal is to generate volume first and refine second. Work through the academic map systematically, by faculty, then by department, then by the sub-specialisms inside each department, and keep a running list without judging entries. When a field dries up, mine the seams between disciplines, the professional and clinical training routes, and the titles that attach a place, a material or a technique to a discipline. Only after you have a long list should you cut the weakest entries. Save your single boldest, most niche pick for the moment you feel the list is running dry, because that is where the points live.
Get a hint
Begin with the widest possible sweep of post-secondary study: every faculty, school and department that confers a formal degree, and let the list run far past the handful of titles everyone knows.
A little more
Once the obvious fields are exhausted, push into the hybrid and vocational corners: programmes that fuse two disciplines into a single named degree, or that prepare students for one licensed trade.
One step further
Now go micro: titles tied to a single material, technique, instrument, region, species, patient group or single campus, often only a few words long and offered by just one institution.
Reveal answers 4,381
- BioarchaeologyDeep Cut85points
- Biobased sciencesDeep Cut85points
- Biobehavioral healthDeep Cut85points
- Biochemical engineeringDeep Cut85points
- Biochemistry and molecular biologyDeep Cut85points
- Biochemistry, biophysics and chemical biologyDeep Cut85points
- Biochemistry, microbiology and molecular biologyDeep Cut85points
- BiodesignDeep Cut85points
- Bioeconomy Sciences and TechnologyDeep Cut85points
- BioelectronicsDeep Cut85points
- BioenergyDeep Cut85points
- Bioenvironmental sciencesDeep Cut85points
- BiogeochemistryDeep Cut85points
- BiogerontologyDeep Cut85points
- Bioinformatics and genomicsDeep Cut85points
- Biological and agricultural engineering technologyDeep Cut85points
- Biological and biomedical sciencesDeep Cut85points
- Biological and environmental engineeringDeep Cut85points
- Biological and physical sciencesDeep Cut85points
- Biological anthropologyDeep Cut85points
- Biological basis of behaviorDeep Cut85points
- Biological chemistryDeep Cut85points
- Biological designDeep Cut85points
- Biological oceanographyDeep Cut85points
- Biological Sciences in Public HealthDeep Cut85points
- Biology and societyDeep Cut85points
- BiomanufacturingDeep Cut85points
- Biomaterials engineeringDeep Cut85points
- Biomechanical EngineeringDeep Cut85points
- BiomechanicsDeep Cut85points
- Biomedical communicationsDeep Cut85points
- Biomedical ComputationDeep Cut85points
- Biomedical data scienceDeep Cut85points
- Biomedical diagnosticsDeep Cut85points
- Biomedical engineering technologyDeep Cut85points
- Biomedical image computingDeep Cut85points
- Biomedical informaticsDeep Cut85points
- Biomedical informatics and data scienceDeep Cut85points
- BiometryDeep Cut85points
- BiomimicryDeep Cut85points
- Biomolecular scienceDeep Cut85points
- Bioprocess engineeringDeep Cut85points
- Bioprocessing scienceDeep Cut85points
- Bioproducts and biosystems engineeringDeep Cut85points
- Biorenewable systemsDeep Cut85points
- Bioscience engineeringDeep Cut85points
- Bioscience EnterpriseDeep Cut85points
- Biosystems engineeringDeep Cut85points
- Biotechnology and bioenterpriseDeep Cut85points
- Biotechnology and genomicsDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
The scoring here rewards specificity, and the reveal shows it plainly. Of the recorded answers, 4298 cleared sixty points, but only one reached the top: Bagpiping at 100, a title so narrow that few players would ever think of it. The 85-point band, 3803 answers deep, is where disciplined, specific thinking lands; entries such as Accelerator physics, Acoustics and music technology, Adult-gerontology nurse practitioner or Accounting information systems each fuse a subject with a qualifier, a population or a second field. The 60-point band, 494 answers, is thinner and holds titles closer to the centre of the distribution: real, respectable degrees whose names are broad enough that a large share of players reach them. Practical lesson: a plain discipline name is short and safe but cheap, a two-part hybrid name is the reliable workhorse, and the rare one-institution curiosity is the only route to a perfect score. Precision in naming, not obscurity of subject, separates the bands.