Krillion Recorded answers
4,381 recorded answers
How to approach it
Treat the answer as a breadth test rather than a knowledge test: the scorer rewards distance from the middle of the distribution, so the goal is to generate volume first and refine second. Work through the academic map systematically, by faculty, then by department, then by the sub-specialisms inside each department, and keep a running list without judging entries. When a field dries up, mine the seams between disciplines, the professional and clinical training routes, and the titles that attach a place, a material or a technique to a discipline. Only after you have a long list should you cut the weakest entries. Save your single boldest, most niche pick for the moment you feel the list is running dry, because that is where the points live.
Get a hint
Begin with the widest possible sweep of post-secondary study: every faculty, school and department that confers a formal degree, and let the list run far past the handful of titles everyone knows.
A little more
Once the obvious fields are exhausted, push into the hybrid and vocational corners: programmes that fuse two disciplines into a single named degree, or that prepare students for one licensed trade.
One step further
Now go micro: titles tied to a single material, technique, instrument, region, species, patient group or single campus, often only a few words long and offered by just one institution.
Reveal answers 4,381
- Computer architectureDeep Cut85points
- Computer engineering technologyDeep Cut85points
- Computer games technologyDeep Cut85points
- Computer Graphics & Game TechnologyDeep Cut85points
- Computer hardware technologyDeep Cut85points
- Computer integrated manufacturingDeep Cut85points
- Computer musicDeep Cut85points
- Computer repair technologyDeep Cut85points
- Computer science + advertisingDeep Cut85points
- Computer science + animal sciencesDeep Cut85points
- Computer science + anthropologyDeep Cut85points
- Computer science + astronomyDeep Cut85points
- Computer science + bioengineeringDeep Cut85points
- Computer science + chemistryDeep Cut85points
- Computer science + crop sciencesDeep Cut85points
- Computer science + geography and geographic information scienceDeep Cut85points
- Computer science + linguisticsDeep Cut85points
- Computer science + musicDeep Cut85points
- Computer science + philosophyDeep Cut85points
- Computer science + physicsDeep Cut85points
- Computer science and artificial intelligenceDeep Cut85points
- Computer science and businessDeep Cut85points
- Computer science and business systemsDeep Cut85points
- Computer science and designDeep Cut85points
- Computer science and information technologyDeep Cut85points
- Computer science and molecular biologyDeep Cut85points
- Computer science and philosophyDeep Cut85points
- Computer Science and PsychologyDeep Cut85points
- Computer science educationDeep Cut85points
- Computer science technologyDeep Cut85points
- Computer science, economics, and data scienceDeep Cut85points
- Computer science, linguistics and a languageDeep Cut85points
- Computer systems engineeringDeep Cut85points
- Computer systems technologyDeep Cut85points
- Computer visionDeep Cut85points
- Computer-aided engineeringDeep Cut85points
- Computing and the ArtsDeep Cut85points
- Concept artDeep Cut85points
- Concrete industry managementDeep Cut85points
- Condensed matter physicsDeep Cut85points
- ConductingDeep Cut85points
- Conflict resolutionDeep Cut85points
- Confucian studiesDeep Cut85points
- Conservation ecologyDeep Cut85points
- Conservation law enforcementDeep Cut85points
- Conservation leadershipDeep Cut85points
- Conservation medicineDeep Cut85points
- Conservation scienceDeep Cut85points
- Construction engineering technologyDeep Cut85points
- Construction lawDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
The scoring here rewards specificity, and the reveal shows it plainly. Of the recorded answers, 4298 cleared sixty points, but only one reached the top: Bagpiping at 100, a title so narrow that few players would ever think of it. The 85-point band, 3803 answers deep, is where disciplined, specific thinking lands; entries such as Accelerator physics, Acoustics and music technology, Adult-gerontology nurse practitioner or Accounting information systems each fuse a subject with a qualifier, a population or a second field. The 60-point band, 494 answers, is thinner and holds titles closer to the centre of the distribution: real, respectable degrees whose names are broad enough that a large share of players reach them. Practical lesson: a plain discipline name is short and safe but cheap, a two-part hybrid name is the reliable workhorse, and the rare one-institution curiosity is the only route to a perfect score. Precision in naming, not obscurity of subject, separates the bands.