Krillion Recorded answers
4,381 recorded answers
How to approach it
Treat the answer as a breadth test rather than a knowledge test: the scorer rewards distance from the middle of the distribution, so the goal is to generate volume first and refine second. Work through the academic map systematically, by faculty, then by department, then by the sub-specialisms inside each department, and keep a running list without judging entries. When a field dries up, mine the seams between disciplines, the professional and clinical training routes, and the titles that attach a place, a material or a technique to a discipline. Only after you have a long list should you cut the weakest entries. Save your single boldest, most niche pick for the moment you feel the list is running dry, because that is where the points live.
Get a hint
Begin with the widest possible sweep of post-secondary study: every faculty, school and department that confers a formal degree, and let the list run far past the handful of titles everyone knows.
A little more
Once the obvious fields are exhausted, push into the hybrid and vocational corners: programmes that fuse two disciplines into a single named degree, or that prepare students for one licensed trade.
One step further
Now go micro: titles tied to a single material, technique, instrument, region, species, patient group or single campus, often only a few words long and offered by just one institution.
Reveal answers 4,381
- Construction scienceDeep Cut85points
- Construction studiesDeep Cut85points
- Construction technologyDeep Cut85points
- Construction tradesDeep Cut85points
- Consumer affairsDeep Cut85points
- Consumer and family financial servicesDeep Cut85points
- Consumer behavior and marketplace studiesDeep Cut85points
- Consumer economicsDeep Cut85points
- Consumer psychologyDeep Cut85points
- Contemplative psychologyDeep Cut85points
- Contemplative studiesDeep Cut85points
- Contemporary artDeep Cut85points
- Contemporary art and curatorial practiceDeep Cut85points
- Contemporary art theoryDeep Cut85points
- Contemporary Asian studiesDeep Cut85points
- Contemporary danceDeep Cut85points
- Contemporary musicDeep Cut85points
- Contemporary writing and productionDeep Cut85points
- Content creationDeep Cut85points
- Continental philosophyDeep Cut85points
- Cooking and nutrition educationDeep Cut85points
- Cooperative managementDeep Cut85points
- Coptic studiesDeep Cut85points
- Corporate communicationDeep Cut85points
- Corporate governanceDeep Cut85points
- Corporate innovation and entrepreneurshipDeep Cut85points
- Corporate social responsibilityDeep Cut85points
- CorrectionsDeep Cut85points
- Corrosion engineeringDeep Cut85points
- CorsicanDeep Cut85points
- Cosmetic chemistryDeep Cut85points
- Cosmetics and fragrance marketingDeep Cut85points
- Costume studiesDeep Cut85points
- Counselor educationDeep Cut85points
- Countryside managementDeep Cut85points
- Court interpretingDeep Cut85points
- Craft educationDeep Cut85points
- Craft scienceDeep Cut85points
- CraftsDeep Cut85points
- Craniofacial scienceDeep Cut85points
- Creative artsDeep Cut85points
- Creative computingDeep Cut85points
- Creative enterprise and cultural leadershipDeep Cut85points
- Creative foresight and futuresDeep Cut85points
- Creative media productionDeep Cut85points
- Creative nonfictionDeep Cut85points
- Creative studiesDeep Cut85points
- Creative technologyDeep Cut85points
- Creative writing and environmentDeep Cut85points
- CreeDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
The scoring here rewards specificity, and the reveal shows it plainly. Of the recorded answers, 4298 cleared sixty points, but only one reached the top: Bagpiping at 100, a title so narrow that few players would ever think of it. The 85-point band, 3803 answers deep, is where disciplined, specific thinking lands; entries such as Accelerator physics, Acoustics and music technology, Adult-gerontology nurse practitioner or Accounting information systems each fuse a subject with a qualifier, a population or a second field. The 60-point band, 494 answers, is thinner and holds titles closer to the centre of the distribution: real, respectable degrees whose names are broad enough that a large share of players reach them. Practical lesson: a plain discipline name is short and safe but cheap, a two-part hybrid name is the reliable workhorse, and the rare one-institution curiosity is the only route to a perfect score. Precision in naming, not obscurity of subject, separates the bands.