Krillion Recorded answers
4,381 recorded answers
How to approach it
Treat the answer as a breadth test rather than a knowledge test: the scorer rewards distance from the middle of the distribution, so the goal is to generate volume first and refine second. Work through the academic map systematically, by faculty, then by department, then by the sub-specialisms inside each department, and keep a running list without judging entries. When a field dries up, mine the seams between disciplines, the professional and clinical training routes, and the titles that attach a place, a material or a technique to a discipline. Only after you have a long list should you cut the weakest entries. Save your single boldest, most niche pick for the moment you feel the list is running dry, because that is where the points live.
Get a hint
Begin with the widest possible sweep of post-secondary study: every faculty, school and department that confers a formal degree, and let the list run far past the handful of titles everyone knows.
A little more
Once the obvious fields are exhausted, push into the hybrid and vocational corners: programmes that fuse two disciplines into a single named degree, or that prepare students for one licensed trade.
One step further
Now go micro: titles tied to a single material, technique, instrument, region, species, patient group or single campus, often only a few words long and offered by just one institution.
Reveal answers 4,381
- Creole studiesDeep Cut85points
- Crime analysisDeep Cut85points
- Crime scienceDeep Cut85points
- Crimean TatarDeep Cut85points
- Criminal justice managementDeep Cut85points
- Criminal justice policyDeep Cut85points
- Criminal justice policy and administrationDeep Cut85points
- CriminalisticsDeep Cut85points
- Criminology, Law and SocietyDeep Cut85points
- Critical and visual studiesDeep Cut85points
- Critical care medicineDeep Cut85points
- Critical care nursingDeep Cut85points
- Critical psychologyDeep Cut85points
- Critical race studiesDeep Cut85points
- Critical studies in equity and solidarityDeep Cut85points
- CroatianDeep Cut85points
- Crop and soil sciencesDeep Cut85points
- Crop production and physiologyDeep Cut85points
- Crop scienceDeep Cut85points
- Cross-border advocacyDeep Cut85points
- Cross-border e-commerceDeep Cut85points
- Cross-cultural studiesDeep Cut85points
- Cross-faculty inquiry in educationDeep Cut85points
- Cruise managementDeep Cut85points
- Cryogenic engineeringDeep Cut85points
- CryptographyDeep Cut85points
- CrystallographyDeep Cut85points
- Culinary managementDeep Cut85points
- Culinary nutritionDeep Cut85points
- Culinary scienceDeep Cut85points
- Cultural anthropology and development sociologyDeep Cut85points
- Cultural astronomy and astrologyDeep Cut85points
- Cultural contentsDeep Cut85points
- Cultural economicsDeep Cut85points
- Cultural heritageDeep Cut85points
- Cultural historyDeep Cut85points
- Cultural industry managementDeep Cut85points
- Cultural journalismDeep Cut85points
- Cultural policyDeep Cut85points
- Cultural psychologyDeep Cut85points
- Cultural resource managementDeep Cut85points
- Culture, creativity and citiesDeep Cut85points
- Culture, technology and environmentDeep Cut85points
- CulturologyDeep Cut85points
- Curatorial practiceDeep Cut85points
- Curriculum and instructionDeep Cut85points
- Curriculum and leadershipDeep Cut85points
- Customer experience managementDeep Cut85points
- Customer relationship managementDeep Cut85points
- Customer service managementDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
The scoring here rewards specificity, and the reveal shows it plainly. Of the recorded answers, 4298 cleared sixty points, but only one reached the top: Bagpiping at 100, a title so narrow that few players would ever think of it. The 85-point band, 3803 answers deep, is where disciplined, specific thinking lands; entries such as Accelerator physics, Acoustics and music technology, Adult-gerontology nurse practitioner or Accounting information systems each fuse a subject with a qualifier, a population or a second field. The 60-point band, 494 answers, is thinner and holds titles closer to the centre of the distribution: real, respectable degrees whose names are broad enough that a large share of players reach them. Practical lesson: a plain discipline name is short and safe but cheap, a two-part hybrid name is the reliable workhorse, and the rare one-institution curiosity is the only route to a perfect score. Precision in naming, not obscurity of subject, separates the bands.