Krillion Recorded answers
4,381 recorded answers
How to approach it
Treat the answer as a breadth test rather than a knowledge test: the scorer rewards distance from the middle of the distribution, so the goal is to generate volume first and refine second. Work through the academic map systematically, by faculty, then by department, then by the sub-specialisms inside each department, and keep a running list without judging entries. When a field dries up, mine the seams between disciplines, the professional and clinical training routes, and the titles that attach a place, a material or a technique to a discipline. Only after you have a long list should you cut the weakest entries. Save your single boldest, most niche pick for the moment you feel the list is running dry, because that is where the points live.
Get a hint
Begin with the widest possible sweep of post-secondary study: every faculty, school and department that confers a formal degree, and let the list run far past the handful of titles everyone knows.
A little more
Once the obvious fields are exhausted, push into the hybrid and vocational corners: programmes that fuse two disciplines into a single named degree, or that prepare students for one licensed trade.
One step further
Now go micro: titles tied to a single material, technique, instrument, region, species, patient group or single campus, often only a few words long and offered by just one institution.
Reveal answers 4,381
- Customs administrationDeep Cut85points
- Customs inspectionDeep Cut85points
- Cyber intelligenceDeep Cut85points
- Cyber operationsDeep Cut85points
- Cyber scienceDeep Cut85points
- Cyber systemsDeep Cut85points
- Cyber-physical systemsDeep Cut85points
- CybercrimeDeep Cut85points
- CyberGIS and geospatial data scienceDeep Cut85points
- CyberneticsDeep Cut85points
- CyberpsychologyDeep Cut85points
- Cybersecurity analytics and operationsDeep Cut85points
- Cybersecurity and digital trustDeep Cut85points
- Cybersecurity engineeringDeep Cut85points
- Cybersecurity lawDeep Cut85points
- Cybersecurity policyDeep Cut85points
- Cybersecurity policy and managementDeep Cut85points
- Cybersecurity technologyDeep Cut85points
- CynologyDeep Cut85points
- Cytogenetic technologyDeep Cut85points
- CytologyDeep Cut85points
- CytopathologyDeep Cut85points
- CytotechnologyDeep Cut85points
- CzechDeep Cut85points
- Czech literatureDeep Cut85points
- Da'wahDeep Cut85points
- Dai medicineDeep Cut85points
- Dairy and food animal managementDeep Cut85points
- Dairy engineeringDeep Cut85points
- Dairy scienceDeep Cut85points
- Dairy technologyDeep Cut85points
- Dakota languageDeep Cut85points
- Dance educationDeep Cut85points
- Dance performanceDeep Cut85points
- Dance scienceDeep Cut85points
- Dance/movement therapyDeep Cut85points
- DanishDeep Cut85points
- Daoist studiesDeep Cut85points
- Data analytics and psychological sciencesDeep Cut85points
- Data analytics and social sciencesDeep Cut85points
- Data analytics and visualizationDeep Cut85points
- Data and AI ethicsDeep Cut85points
- Data engineeringDeep Cut85points
- Data intensive scienceDeep Cut85points
- Data journalismDeep Cut85points
- Data miningDeep Cut85points
- Data processingDeep Cut85points
- Data science and decision analyticsDeep Cut85points
- Data science and social systemsDeep Cut85points
- Data science for artistic and cultural analysisDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
The scoring here rewards specificity, and the reveal shows it plainly. Of the recorded answers, 4298 cleared sixty points, but only one reached the top: Bagpiping at 100, a title so narrow that few players would ever think of it. The 85-point band, 3803 answers deep, is where disciplined, specific thinking lands; entries such as Accelerator physics, Acoustics and music technology, Adult-gerontology nurse practitioner or Accounting information systems each fuse a subject with a qualifier, a population or a second field. The 60-point band, 494 answers, is thinner and holds titles closer to the centre of the distribution: real, respectable degrees whose names are broad enough that a large share of players reach them. Practical lesson: a plain discipline name is short and safe but cheap, a two-part hybrid name is the reliable workhorse, and the rare one-institution curiosity is the only route to a perfect score. Precision in naming, not obscurity of subject, separates the bands.