Krillion Recorded answers
4,381 recorded answers
How to approach it
Treat the answer as a breadth test rather than a knowledge test: the scorer rewards distance from the middle of the distribution, so the goal is to generate volume first and refine second. Work through the academic map systematically, by faculty, then by department, then by the sub-specialisms inside each department, and keep a running list without judging entries. When a field dries up, mine the seams between disciplines, the professional and clinical training routes, and the titles that attach a place, a material or a technique to a discipline. Only after you have a long list should you cut the weakest entries. Save your single boldest, most niche pick for the moment you feel the list is running dry, because that is where the points live.
Get a hint
Begin with the widest possible sweep of post-secondary study: every faculty, school and department that confers a formal degree, and let the list run far past the handful of titles everyone knows.
A little more
Once the obvious fields are exhausted, push into the hybrid and vocational corners: programmes that fuse two disciplines into a single named degree, or that prepare students for one licensed trade.
One step further
Now go micro: titles tied to a single material, technique, instrument, region, species, patient group or single campus, often only a few words long and offered by just one institution.
Reveal answers 4,381
- Data science for biologyDeep Cut85points
- Data science for food and healthDeep Cut85points
- Data science for health and social careDeep Cut85points
- Data science for public policyDeep Cut85points
- Data science technologiesDeep Cut85points
- Data science, analytics and engineeringDeep Cut85points
- Data visualizationDeep Cut85points
- Data-driven breeding and geneticsDeep Cut85points
- Data, economics, and design of policyDeep Cut85points
- Data, inequality and societyDeep Cut85points
- Deaf educationDeep Cut85points
- Deaf studiesDeep Cut85points
- Dealer service technologyDeep Cut85points
- Decision scienceDeep Cut85points
- Decorative artsDeep Cut85points
- Defense analysisDeep Cut85points
- Delta managementDeep Cut85points
- Dementia studiesDeep Cut85points
- DemographyDeep Cut85points
- Dental anesthesiologyDeep Cut85points
- Dental educationDeep Cut85points
- Dental laboratory technologyDeep Cut85points
- Dental materialsDeep Cut85points
- Dental nursingDeep Cut85points
- Dental public healthDeep Cut85points
- Dental scienceDeep Cut85points
- Dental therapyDeep Cut85points
- Dependable software systemsDeep Cut85points
- Design and environmental analysisDeep Cut85points
- Design and innovationDeep Cut85points
- Design and technologyDeep Cut85points
- Design computingDeep Cut85points
- Design engineeringDeep Cut85points
- Design for changeDeep Cut85points
- Design for human healthDeep Cut85points
- Design for social innovationDeep Cut85points
- Design informaticsDeep Cut85points
- Design managementDeep Cut85points
- Design scienceDeep Cut85points
- Design strategyDeep Cut85points
- Design studiesDeep Cut85points
- Design, environment and the artsDeep Cut85points
- Design, technology and societyDeep Cut85points
- Designed objectsDeep Cut85points
- Desktop publishingDeep Cut85points
- Development communicationDeep Cut85points
- Development economicsDeep Cut85points
- Development sociologyDeep Cut85points
- Development studiesDeep Cut85points
- Developmental biologyDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
The scoring here rewards specificity, and the reveal shows it plainly. Of the recorded answers, 4298 cleared sixty points, but only one reached the top: Bagpiping at 100, a title so narrow that few players would ever think of it. The 85-point band, 3803 answers deep, is where disciplined, specific thinking lands; entries such as Accelerator physics, Acoustics and music technology, Adult-gerontology nurse practitioner or Accounting information systems each fuse a subject with a qualifier, a population or a second field. The 60-point band, 494 answers, is thinner and holds titles closer to the centre of the distribution: real, respectable degrees whose names are broad enough that a large share of players reach them. Practical lesson: a plain discipline name is short and safe but cheap, a two-part hybrid name is the reliable workhorse, and the rare one-institution curiosity is the only route to a perfect score. Precision in naming, not obscurity of subject, separates the bands.