Krillion Recorded answers
4,381 recorded answers
How to approach it
Treat the answer as a breadth test rather than a knowledge test: the scorer rewards distance from the middle of the distribution, so the goal is to generate volume first and refine second. Work through the academic map systematically, by faculty, then by department, then by the sub-specialisms inside each department, and keep a running list without judging entries. When a field dries up, mine the seams between disciplines, the professional and clinical training routes, and the titles that attach a place, a material or a technique to a discipline. Only after you have a long list should you cut the weakest entries. Save your single boldest, most niche pick for the moment you feel the list is running dry, because that is where the points live.
Get a hint
Begin with the widest possible sweep of post-secondary study: every faculty, school and department that confers a formal degree, and let the list run far past the handful of titles everyone knows.
A little more
Once the obvious fields are exhausted, push into the hybrid and vocational corners: programmes that fuse two disciplines into a single named degree, or that prepare students for one licensed trade.
One step further
Now go micro: titles tied to a single material, technique, instrument, region, species, patient group or single campus, often only a few words long and offered by just one institution.
Reveal answers 4,381
- Developmental educationDeep Cut85points
- Developmental linguisticsDeep Cut85points
- Developmental neuropsychomotor therapyDeep Cut85points
- Developmental neuroscienceDeep Cut85points
- Developmental psychopathologyDeep Cut85points
- Developmental scienceDeep Cut85points
- DevOpsDeep Cut85points
- DhivehiDeep Cut85points
- DiabetesDeep Cut85points
- Diaconal studiesDeep Cut85points
- Diagnostic biochemistryDeep Cut85points
- Dialysis technologyDeep Cut85points
- Diaspora studiesDeep Cut85points
- Diesel technologyDeep Cut85points
- Diet and exerciseDeep Cut85points
- Dietetic technologyDeep Cut85points
- Digital agricultureDeep Cut85points
- Digital anthropologyDeep Cut85points
- Digital arts and experimental mediaDeep Cut85points
- Digital arts and sciencesDeep Cut85points
- Digital businessDeep Cut85points
- Digital communicationDeep Cut85points
- Digital cultural tourismDeep Cut85points
- Digital cultureDeep Cut85points
- Digital curationDeep Cut85points
- Digital dentistryDeep Cut85points
- Digital designDeep Cut85points
- Digital design and manufactureDeep Cut85points
- Digital economyDeep Cut85points
- Digital educationDeep Cut85points
- Digital healthDeep Cut85points
- Digital humanitiesDeep Cut85points
- Digital journalismDeep Cut85points
- Digital manufacturing and IoTDeep Cut85points
- Digital media designDeep Cut85points
- Digital media influenceDeep Cut85points
- Digital media technologyDeep Cut85points
- Digital musicDeep Cut85points
- Digital policyDeep Cut85points
- Digital sociologyDeep Cut85points
- Digital storytellingDeep Cut85points
- Digital strategy and audience engagementDeep Cut85points
- Digital studiesDeep Cut85points
- Digital transformationDeep Cut85points
- Diné studiesDeep Cut85points
- Disability studiesDeep Cut85points
- Disaster medicineDeep Cut85points
- Disaster nursingDeep Cut85points
- Discrete mathematicsDeep Cut85points
- Dispute resolutionDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
The scoring here rewards specificity, and the reveal shows it plainly. Of the recorded answers, 4298 cleared sixty points, but only one reached the top: Bagpiping at 100, a title so narrow that few players would ever think of it. The 85-point band, 3803 answers deep, is where disciplined, specific thinking lands; entries such as Accelerator physics, Acoustics and music technology, Adult-gerontology nurse practitioner or Accounting information systems each fuse a subject with a qualifier, a population or a second field. The 60-point band, 494 answers, is thinner and holds titles closer to the centre of the distribution: real, respectable degrees whose names are broad enough that a large share of players reach them. Practical lesson: a plain discipline name is short and safe but cheap, a two-part hybrid name is the reliable workhorse, and the rare one-institution curiosity is the only route to a perfect score. Precision in naming, not obscurity of subject, separates the bands.